Last night I played in a $ 10 rebuy contest on one of the online poker servers through my laptop in the room, really enjoyed playing & fun. & there are awkward events when my best friends buy-in are consistently 21 once without winning.
Was he unlucky? Doesn't it hurt him? Or how? Or could he want to tell about his defeat in his latest novel like the author of another novel who pretended to go down to a real state to write a novel, so? Nga, bro. He lost at all!
We can watch the problem, which is a problem that passes commonly for low level games, aka cupu (geeky). & the aspect for the novice player certainly causes a loss that is not less compared to the level of victory.
I try to find a person who knows less about "tilt" than my friend who sells hamburgers, who only make hamburgers while whistling is not bright, so the saliva is broken into hamburger cooking oil. By the way, those who don't know the terms of poker games, you just need to search google for you and don't have to know all about the term poker to be able to play poker, unless you are a poker enthusiast Search for online courses for poker games taught online by Caucasians, of course you must hold the term dictionary tightly when the course takes place.
Well, I just explained that the "tilt" is a term for defining the mental condition of a poker player when a game is going on, be it frustrating or emotionally confused because the player does not create tactics before playing games, and most of these cause the player has been exceeded aggressively because of the emotional outburst that goes to the player's individual.
Being for beginners I can discuss the mentality that must be possessed in playing poker.
And consistently this explanation could be a bit long, but I think this should be done in order to take you and my friends out of the threshold of this beginner zone rather you don't lose a few more chips when playing at the poker table. It could be a reasonable aspect that I made that was my argument to connect poker discussion articles for this beginner.
Well, here is an excerpt from a game mentor named Jared Tendler who has worked with more than 250 poker players. His newest book is, "The Mental Game of Poker 2".
One location where poker is not similar in significant ways to other games is the degree to which competitors are equal. For tournaments, you are given a sufficient number of chips & as many as other players, and also you are given the same chance to compete with other players. Being here you don't build muscle together with lots of expensive nutrition & win the game because you have less muscle. But here we say about experience, reasoning, emotional, & solutions to problems that arise when playing poker. It's not fair if we only mention IQ or the level of intelligence of the brain of one person, because EQ or the level of emotional control also plays a major role here, especially for professionals.
We are able to take another sample, for example a soccer game that is chosen by a balanced body by the football league itself to compete, the runners immediately fight only the other participants who have a qualifying record to win the race. Like a boxer and only against boxers from a balanced class. You can see my purpose, right?
Against it usually doesn't work with poker, where in poker there is an element of unequal emphasis on finding matches that are significantly weaker. Regularly, the winner of the world of poker games is required to play with amateur players to the same table. Because of the fact, the class differences between big and small classes can sometimes be equated with one professional playing around 20 tournaments, & is the twenty times the amateur loses all? Uncertain. From here, we can learn & read at least the games played by one professional person. & for every problem I believe there is certainly a solution, if you say it is uncertain, I believe that because you haven't found it yet.
Sports contests develop & advance rapidly to close distance championships in order to gain little sympathy from not a few spectators. & however, poker players form their money together to find a great excellence point. The problem is that if you are just looking for money, or we are more familiar with easy-money, as soon as possible it can damage your development & so will the gap that you actually have in each game.
So feel challenged, feeling like that is a very used component to seek knowledge & play around in one zone. One of the leading theories of a Hungarian psychologist named Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, who published the book, "Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience." He defines, being in the zone which is the opinion of "Flow", where one person fully immerses himself in what they run.
To achieve the opinion of this flow, balance must find between the expertise of one suspect & the challenge to his task. In other words, the suspect needs to feel that the pass is challenged & has a decent skill towards the job to meet the challenge.
As you can see, the size of one challenge & the number of skills you have in a separate way that is not absolute is the connection between the two that ensures your ability to reach the zone.
When your skill is low & the challenge is low, or when the challenge is high & your skills are high, you can implement them in the zone.
However, if you are a very oppressed person, you can be flooded with challenges & according to Mihaly, you can experience anxiety, not Flow. & vice versa, if you hope for easily destroying a weak opponent, you will certainly feel bored with the challenges that go beyond light & after that fall out of the zone.
Boredom Takes You Out of the Zone.
Boredom in a typical way feels that when you strike you feel challenged & nothing new or interesting to learn. Just like your computer that you have not used lately for the boredom argument, your mind is left silent & just waits to be activated.
Boredom is the result of a feeling of lack of challenge. When the show has passed, the rest will certainly be easy to get into the game that you have planned whatever it is either A or B. You understand my purpose, right?
It can be said that it makes sense that when poker starts to feel like a monotonous task, you are given the same card handle every time. Now, you are dealt with the As-King card & it has passed for consideration which is a standard element & has the potential to become bored.
But after all, the players who have passion & motivation are related to watching nuances & every second the uniqueness of playing tricks for each round, they won't get bored. They watch physical telling, game timing, crazy / drunken games, combinatorics, distance balance, priority actions, table descriptions, and not a few other details that players don't consider.
The dynamics in poker are varied & in a constant way of switching, being the same card holding time that can be shared repeatedly, each hand will be played in unique ways. There is always a room where we are able to carve out new advantages, the game always switches, constantly evolves, and there is always less to learn.
The easy way to endure boredom is to decide that there is always something you are interested in learning.
Are there parts of the game that you want to do, but you always postpone it? Focusing on this room can increase your preferences & also provide challenges in the same tempo.
What specific tricks can you create that always feel challenged against weak opponents? Create a game in the game, just like how fast & how accurately you are able to interpret their game.
What news can be useful to collect when your card dies? Assume you will find something related to other players who will help you to use them on your later grip card & your challenge is to find out that aspect.
There will always be something you can do to create more enjoyable learning & the game becomes more challenging. This is where you always have to always try to keep your sharp eyes aiming at your goals / successes & be prepared to filter them into joining a new challenge.
